Back to Blog

Fast or slow consumption recovery?

Eylert Ellefsen
Archived blog post. This blog post has been transferred from our previous blogging platform. Links and images may not work as intended.

DISCLAIMER: The negative consumption effect stems from authorities measures to curb the Corona pandemic. EQ’s consumption systems allow us to measure and quantify the impact as new actual data arrives. We do not claim to know when or how the authorities will lift the current business quarantine. In this blog post, we simulate and quantify the energy and load effect of some alternative paths back to normal.

Current situation

On 19 March, EQ published a blog post about the falling electricity consumption due to Coronavirus across Europe. We followed ten countries from week 10 (Monday 2 March), and we have now updated the numbers until end week 17.

The consumption reduction has more or less leveled out by Easter (week 15). We observe the beginning of a recovery phase in countries like Italy, France and Spain, which have suffered most from the pandemic. These countries introduced the hardest lockdowns which have, to some extent, been easing after Easter.

The near future is uncertain, both for how to combat the Coronavirus epidemic and for the economic outlook. EQ has studied consumption development so far and simulates some scenarios to show possible paths of recovery towards New Year. EQ does not believe that the European markets will reach the normal curve by New Year in any of the presented scenarios.

Consumption levels in percentage of a Coronavirus-free scenario.

Base scenarios

We see similarities between some countries. Thus we have made three categories of countries/areas:

  1. France/Italy/Spain: These countries have had 18%-19% reduction before Easter, and seem to follow a kind of parallel development.
  2. Nordic region: An approximately 3% reduction. No significant percentage difference between these four countries so far.
  3. Other countries in Western Europe: In most cases, being close to 10% reduction, they seem to follow each other quite carefully.

For these three categories, we generated weighted %-average reduction curves, actual until week 17 and a suggested base scenario for further development until the end of 2020.

The dotted yellow line indicates the weighted %-reduction across all Western Europe, 15 countries consuming 2516 TWh/year – the normal for 2020 before the Coronavirus epidemic.

We believe that measures from the authorities will mainly determine the recovery-profile towards the start of Q4-2020. Towards New Year, we believe that the economic reality will mean more for the development as the infection hopefully will be less severe.

We also believe that the strong recovery we have seen from week 13/14 will be somewhat dampened the next few months, as the measures to combat the Corona-infection will still be in place across Europe.

When estimating the level by New Year, we have an assumption of about 4 % reduced consumption for France/Italy/Spain (Category 1 – weighted) by New Year. Meaning, we suggest that consumption levels by the end of 2021 will reach to recover to the original 2020. The other categories are simulated proportional to Category 1 as a simplification with so much uncertainty.

We estimate furthermore that the weighted average curve for Western Europe (15 countries) will by the end of 2020 show reduced consumption of about 3 %. By week 13/14 the weighted reduction across Western Europe was about 11%, which was nearly 35 000 MW accumulated. The rapid fall from week 10 has been exceptional in all ways, and we see a recovery trend towards 10 000 MW reduction by New Year (3% reduction).

A base scenario of consumption reduction throughout 2020 for countries in Western Europe.

We have estimated the TWh-reduction for 2020 in total for these three categories:

Consumption reduction categories.

The Nordic reduction is meager based on the observed consumption-reaction so far. The rest of Europe shows a Coronavirus-reduction which is similar to the losses we saw during the financial crises of 6% reduction in 2009. This swift downward reaction during March (week 10-14) is however exceptional.

Recovery scenarios

EQ has made two more scenarios to indicate possible recovery profiles across Europe towards New Year. These scenarios are made for the weighted West European average (Category 1–3).

Fast-recovery scenario. Based on a recovery profile that continues on the recovery trend seen after Easter and assumes more easing of Corona-measures. That means a very positive development of the infection across Europe, but can not be ignored as a scenario. Fast recovery also means that the consumption loss towards New Year is somewhat limited, see the chart below.

Slow-recovery scenario. Opposite to the fast-recovery scenario. Measures are easing slower as the infection across Europe is not dampened that much. Thus the economic consequences hit harder, and consumption declines stronger.

The charts shows that the slow-recovery scenario indicates 10.000 more consumption losses at end of 2020 than in the fast-recovery scenario.

Fast- and slow-recovery scenarios.

See table for how much the differences in scenarios mean for total consumption reduction 2020. Given our proposals, we could see a 4% - 6% consumption reduction. That is not so different from what we saw during the financial crisis in 2009.

European consumption reduction scenarios. Aggregated for 2020.

Final words

The consumption across Europe dived sharply during March and started its recovery in April. The outlooks identified by the three scenarios Fast, Base and Slow Recovery are, of course, very uncertain. Every day we get more information on how the electricity market as a whole will develop during this recovery phase we now undergoing.

EQ continues to follow-up on the development and will publish more blog posts to keep our customers updated. Don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding consumption development or other related issues.

More from the Blog

Could France become a net-importer with nuclear power at it’s lowest since 1991?

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

The available nuclear capacity in France was very low at the end of Q4 last year, whilst outlooks for Q1-2022 were also lower than normal by the end of 2021. Around this time, we published a blog post focusing on the low availability during February, which could mean a strained supply situation in a cold-weather scenario. This was reflected in very strong forward prices for Q1-months during December as markets included strong risk premiums in case of a cold spell.

Read Story

Nuclear + Coal Exits in Germany – Status Update January 2022

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

The German nuclear and coal exits since 2020 have had a strong influence on the country’s production fleet. In order to identify and illustrate the changes in power generation sources within the last 2 years, EQ has studied the German January power balances for 2020, 2021, and 2022. Initially, we have updated both the exit and capacity plans for the nuclear, as well as the coal-fleet as an introduction to the power balance and production numbers.

Read Story

Hydropower Review Alp Region 2021 and Outlooks for 2022

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

Electricity generated by hydropower across the Alp region (France, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, and Germany) has an average annual net production of about 187 TWh - covering approximately 14% of total consumption in the area. Of these countries, France has the highest hydropower output at 59 TWh net, while Switzerland and Austria at about 35 TWh are what we would consider as the most typical hydropower areas – which cover about 50% of their consumption from hydropower. This blog post from EQ contains a short review of the hydropower conditions for 2021, as well as a view of the current situation and hydrological balance.

Read Story

Ready to try Energy Quantified?

No payment or credit card required.
Would you rather like a personal demo? Book a demo