Back to Blog

Hydropower after thunderstorm Alex dampens CWE spot prices by 1.0–1.5 €/MWh

Eylert Ellefsen
Archived blog post. This blog post has been transferred from our previous blogging platform. Links and images may not work as intended.

When thunderstorm Alex hit France and the Alpine region on 2 and 3 October it caused devastating flooding in several areas as precipitation hit once-in-a-century levels. In this blog post, we assess the impact on CWE spot prices and the hydrological balance in the region.

Energy Quantified (EQ) published a blog post on 6 October where we shared our preliminary assessment of the impacts from thunderstorm Alex. In this update, we quantify the impact on prices and the hydrological balance (weeks 40-42).  

Key takeaways from this update are:

  • For week 40 – ending at Oct 4th – the weekly net energy precipitation in Switzerland, France, Italy and Austria was 13 TWh (219%) higher than normal
  • Hydropower production in weeks 41-42 increased about 4500 MW from levels in week 39
  • The spot price impact of the increased hydropower production in the region was in the 0.9 – 1.6 €/MWh range for weeks 41/42

CWE spot price impacts

The estimated 4500 MW increase in hydropower production across the CWE region over weeks 40-42 were unevenly distributed across the countries we have assessed:

Hydropower production week by week for France, Switzerland, Italy and Austria.

Using our spot price sensitivity model we continually estimate the spot price relative to the changes in production levels in each country.

The chart below shows the price sensitivity curves for the hourly spot price in France for Thursday 8 Oct relative to varying production levels, in this case, +/- 2500 MW, 5000 MW and 7500 MW. Sensitivities are calculated for each hour and change every day based on the power balance situation.

Spot model sensitivities as forecasted on 6 October for the French spot price on 8 October.

We have estimated the partial price-effect for the increased hydropower production for France, Switzerland and Italy for week 41 and 42 to be between – 0.73-1.15 €/MWh:

Calculated model sensitivities vs. estimated partial price-effect for increased hydropower production in France, Switzerland and Italy.

These estimates are based on a country-by-country effect, but since these countries/areas are to varying degrees connected, we believe that the combined price-effect is stronger.

Weekly spot prices in €/MWh for France, Switzerland and Italy.

We see from the actual spot prices that FR and CH are most strongly connected in this period, while Italian prices are  – not surprisingly – a bit higher.

Assuming a 75% interaction FR/IT in addition to the partial estimate, we derive from this the following total price impact from the increase in hydropower production:

Price impact with the assumption of 75% interaction between France and Italy in addition to the partial estimate above.

Key hydrological data week 39-41

The increase in precipitation period started already during week 39, and for the period week 39-41 we have estimated net precipitation to as shown in this table:

Actual net precipitation energy (% of normal) for France, Switzerland, Italy and Austria during weeks 39-41.

We estimate that about 15%-20% of the precipitation during week 40 has was spilt outside the power plants and hydro reservoirs. The net accumulated precipitation for the period is about 13 TWh above normal, while the hydrological balance at the end of each week evolved as seen in this table:

Hydrological balance from week 38 to week 42 for France, Switzerland, Italy and Austria.

We observe that the hydrological balance – by end of week 41 – has improved by 11.5 TWh since the end of week 38, which means that hydropower production has been 13.0 – 11.5 = 1.5 TWh higher than normal during that period. By the end of week 42, the hydrological balance in all CWE-countries was stronger than normal.

Final words

The short-term effect of the improved hydrological balance across the Alps has been calculated based on our sensitivity model. EQ will continue to assess the impact on spot markets when such "hydrology shocks" occur.

The price impact of fluctuating hydropower power production is often difficult to evaluate as production levels as hydropower’s share of total production is limited in the CWE area. Energy Quantified's spot price-sensitivity model helps users assess the price-impact of hydropower in other regions as well.

And don't forget to sign up for more details about the hydrological situation.

More from the Blog

Could France become a net-importer with nuclear power at it’s lowest since 1991?

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

The available nuclear capacity in France was very low at the end of Q4 last year, whilst outlooks for Q1-2022 were also lower than normal by the end of 2021. Around this time, we published a blog post focusing on the low availability during February, which could mean a strained supply situation in a cold-weather scenario. This was reflected in very strong forward prices for Q1-months during December as markets included strong risk premiums in case of a cold spell.

Read Story

Nuclear + Coal Exits in Germany – Status Update January 2022

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

The German nuclear and coal exits since 2020 have had a strong influence on the country’s production fleet. In order to identify and illustrate the changes in power generation sources within the last 2 years, EQ has studied the German January power balances for 2020, 2021, and 2022. Initially, we have updated both the exit and capacity plans for the nuclear, as well as the coal-fleet as an introduction to the power balance and production numbers.

Read Story

Hydropower Review Alp Region 2021 and Outlooks for 2022

Eylert Ellefsen
Eylert Ellefsen

Electricity generated by hydropower across the Alp region (France, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, and Germany) has an average annual net production of about 187 TWh - covering approximately 14% of total consumption in the area. Of these countries, France has the highest hydropower output at 59 TWh net, while Switzerland and Austria at about 35 TWh are what we would consider as the most typical hydropower areas – which cover about 50% of their consumption from hydropower. This blog post from EQ contains a short review of the hydropower conditions for 2021, as well as a view of the current situation and hydrological balance.

Read Story

Ready to try Energy Quantified?

No payment or credit card required.
Would you rather like a personal demo? Book a demo